From dc22b0efd4862fa99b2e59e5f7030cd401e3b75d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mario Zechner Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 19:01:35 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] chore(prompts): require independent issue analysis --- .pi/prompts/is.md | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/.pi/prompts/is.md b/.pi/prompts/is.md index f57561f6..28053dfe 100644 --- a/.pi/prompts/is.md +++ b/.pi/prompts/is.md @@ -6,14 +6,16 @@ Analyze GitHub issue(s): $ARGUMENTS For each issue: 1. Read the issue in full, including all comments and linked issues/PRs. +2. Do not trust analysis written in the issue. Independently verify behavior and derive your own analysis from the code and execution path. -2. **For bugs**: +3. **For bugs**: - Ignore any root cause analysis in the issue (likely wrong) - Read all related code files in full (no truncation) - Trace the code path and identify the actual root cause - Propose a fix -3. **For feature requests**: +4. **For feature requests**: + - Do not trust implementation proposals in the issue without verification - Read all related code files in full (no truncation) - Propose the most concise implementation approach - List affected files and changes needed